I just walked out of a spectacular performance of Macbeth by the National Theater of London, co-directed) by Kenneth Branagh. He also played the title role. The common tag line for this classic is “A play of greed and power.” Which it most certainly is…but is it all?
As I was watching the play for the umpteenth time I had the feeling today that it is about much more. Shakespeare, as he is wont to do, is in fact subtly delivering a bigger message about the human psyche. And then it came to me in a flash. Macbeth is contemplating the murder of Duncan, the benevolent king who is his kin, and is a guest in his castle. What would propel him to commit such a treacherous act? He says,
“I have no spur
To prick the sides of my intent, but only
Vaulting ambition, which o’erleaps itself
And falls upon th‘ other”.
Or in more modern, but less brilliant language, the only thing motivating me is ambition, which makes people rush ahead of themselves toward disaster.
Ambition has been the subject of many genetic, psychological and anthropological studies. And yet, its nature and its driving force remain elusive. Evolutionary biologists contend that ambition has a great survival value, hence it is coded in our genes and hard-wired in our brain.
Many animals are known to signal their ambitious tendencies almost from birth. Even before wolf pups are weaned, they begin sorting themselves out into alphas and all the others. The alphas are quicker, more curious, greedier for space, milk, and Mom — and they stay that way for life.
Alpha wolves wander widely, breed annually and may live to a geriatric 10 or 11 years old. Lower-ranking wolves enjoy none of these benefits — staying close to home, breeding rarely and usually dying before they’re 4. This example and others, taken from the animal world, demonstrate behavioral determinism that is controlled by genes. Humans are different in a very important way: we make long-term plans. And what could ambition require if not conscious, deliberate long-term planning?
Is nature a zero sum game?
The natural selection argument makes the implicit assumption that nature is a zero sum game, and it is probably true in an environment of limited resources. Every antelope that I hunt for my family is one less antelope for yours. Except that a visit to the African
Except that a visit to the African Bush would quickly disprove this premise: the place is teeming with antelopes and other prey, grazing peacefully by the hundreds and thousands. The argument, however, has a more plausible ring to it when we consider modern societies. In societies comprised of largely poor and lower middle classes, ours comes to mind, we admire Horatio Alger-type stories, never mind that most of them are apocryphal. Sociological studies have shown that ambition is especially high among the lower and middle class; psychologists call it “status anxiety”, the fear that although your present job is sort of OK, if disaster strikes you won’t have enough resources to feed your family. Parents sacrificing for their children so they would fare better in life is a variant of “status anxiety.”
Sociological studies have shown that ambition is especially high among the lower and middle class; psychologists call it “status anxiety”, the fear that although your present job is sort of OK, if disaster strikes you won’t have enough resources to feed your family. Parents sacrificing for their children so they would fare better in life is a variant of “status anxiety.”
Social status, upbringing, genetics – they may contribute, yet they still don’t explain everything. Just consider President Jimmy Carter and his buffoon brother Billy. Or FDR, born to an aristocratic family, no worry about finances, no obvious ambition to reach any heights, dismissed by Tammany Hall as an effete rich boy, contracted polio and had to overcome physical adversity. That, and his philanthropic work with polio victims brought him face to face with hardship and social deprivation – and a towering leader was born.
Which brings me back to Macbeth.
In the fog-shrouded time of Macbeth when “fire in the belly” gave rise to plots, assassinations and mass murders. And in our own, more enlightened days? Well, plots, assassination, and genocide are still very much with us. Yes, we have Steve Jobs. But for every Jobs, we have many Bernie Madoffs. For every Jonas Salk, we have Elmer Gantrys and assorted religious charlatans. For every Bill Clinton, we have Ted Cruzes, willing to sink the world economy for their vaulting ambitions. So is ambition good or bad? Like everything else, it depends.