If Nebraska’s public relations blitz about the success of its wellness program is to be believed, state employees have sixty times the cancer incidence of former residents of Love Canal. The only other interpretation is that, in the name of wellness, state employees were subject to the most overdiagnosis and overtreatment ever documented—at taxpayer expense, no less.
Here is the one fact that is known to the public: Prompted by a mass mailing and copay waivers encouraging them to go get cancer screens, 514 of the participating state employees who underwent biometric screens were identified as having undiagnosed “early stage cancer,..resulting in early treatment.” (There were also 26 with later-stage cancer, for a total of 540.)
Massive over diagnosis?
The question is, 514 out of how many? Both the state’s vendor, Health Fitness Corporation, and point person for the program Roger Wilson are refusing to say absent a Freedom of Information Act request—the marketing equivalent of “pleading the Fifth” for a program they previously couldn’t shut up about it—so we can only guess. Start with the roughly 7000 employees who took part in a basic blood test. Let’s call that the pool (out of a total of 20,000 program-eligible employees and spouses) of potential screening participants, on the theory that almost no one would submit to a complex screen without also submitting to a simple one.
Start with the roughly 7000 employees who took part in a basic blood test. Let’s call that the pool (out of a total of 20,000 program-eligible employees and spouses) of potential screening participants, on the theory that almost no one would submit to a complex screen without also submitting to a simple one.
Then, take out maybe 30% who were too young to be screened for cancer, and assume another 20% were already getting appropriate screens, you’d be screening 3500 people anew. That yields a cancer rate of 15% in a two-year period. As mentioned in the first paragraph, to put this massive overdiagnosis in perspective, Love Canal residents had a 5% cancer rate in a 20-year period—one sixtieth of the alleged Nebraska rate.
Nebraska’s massive over diagnosis is not a belt-and-suspenders approach that saves lives even if some people don’t benefit. Quite the opposite is true—cancer treatments themselves have health consequences, but no doubt most of those 15% identified with early-stage cancer elected to undergo expensive, debilitating, futile and potentially harmful “early treatments” that the state could have avoided by taking the recommendations of medical societies not to screen and/or simply doing a little arithmetic and not sending out mass mailings recommending cancer screens, and/or realizing that 15% of people do not have undiagnosed clinically significant cancer and that state employees should stop over-utilizing screening tests. (Ironically, “overutilization of healthcare services” was one of the justifications for Nebraska’s program cited in their report.)
Spend more, save more?
The state also opened its checkbook to reduce or eliminate co-pays on many chronic disease medications, which proved a windfall for state employees because fully 2400 new annual prescriptions (among those 7000 participants—once again, a very high diagnosis rate) are now being written for hypertension or high blood pressure, as a result of further screening.
Yet somehow, despite the cancer expenses, waived co-pays, and a large proportion of the population being newly medicated, the state “cut employee health claim costs by millions.” Such are the magic beans of wellness. It doesn’t matter how much you spend—in order to continue to receive funding, you simply claim impossible savings and hope no one notices you’re lying. Or if the program administrators aren’t intentionally lying and genuinely believe they saved $4.7 million by having risk factors decline at least temporarily for roughly 160 participants (saving a mathematically impossible $30,000 per participant who lost a little weight or recently stopped smoking), they would certainly lack the sophistication needed to recognize massive cancer overdiagnosis. One more reason they shouldn’t be “playing doctor” with their employees’ health.
Is the whole wellness industry like this?
Considering all that overdiagnosis, overtreatment and the obviously fictional savings figures, you might be thinking, “This program must be an outlier. The whole industry can’t be like this.” And you’d be right. The Nebraska program is an outlier—but in the other direction. The combination of fictitious savings and cancer overdiagnosis/overtreatment won Nebraska the 2012 C. Everett Koop Award as one of the country’s best wellness programs, as well as awards from the Wellness Council of America and others. (In case you haven’t heard of WELCOA, here is an overview.) Both the fictitious savings and the 500+ cancer cases received plaudits from America’s Health Insurance Plans as well.
The major question raised by this debacle and the cover-up that has followed is, why isn’t there any adult supervision of these programs? Oh, wait a second, there is adult supervision: Nebraska’s wellness vendor is accredited by the National Committee for Quality Assurance.
So a better question would be, who is supervising the adults? Someone better start doing it soon, because statistically speaking it won’t be long before a state employee actually dies from complications of one of these cancers over treatments, in the name of wellness.
Books by Al Lewis: