Many policymakers, professionals, and researchers in the substance abuse treatment field believe that Medication Assisted Therapy or MAT is still heavily underutilized. This is particularly relevant considering the continued opioid crisis plaguing our country. There are many barriers in place in implementing MAT.
These barriers include a lack of resources, clinical resistance, and the lack of support in traditional recovery pathways (e.g., 12 step fellowships) for using MAT to name a few.1 Methadone and Suboxone are two commonly used drugs used in MAT. Understanding what methadone and suboxone are, and what they do, is important as we begin to explore the effectiveness of their use in criminal justice settings.
Methadone blocks the high associated with taking opiates including heroin. When used appropriately, methadone reduces cravings and the withdrawals symptoms of opioid addiction.2 Methadone is most often dispersed in treatment centers and other clinical settings. It is long acting and slow to metabolize in the body. In using methadone, finding the appropriate dose is critical to avoid the “zombie” feelings and effects often associated with its use. Suitable dosing is often elusive to find because clinics often serve so many patients and have so little resources limiting the time and expertise needed to find the appropriate dose.3
Suboxone is another drug commonly used to combat the effects of opioid addiction. Suboxone combines two drugs buprenorphine and naloxone. The first drug in Suboxone buprenorphine is a type of opioid medication. Like methadone, buprenorphine is long lasting and slow to metabolize and is seen as a powerful alternative to other opioids more commonly abused (e.g., heroin and Oxycontin). Often used in detox scenarios, it is utilized to reduce the long-term symptom of opioid cravings over time. It is a convenient drug because it can be used in a variety of different settings from treatment centers to home use under the care of a doctor. The second drug in Suboxone is naloxone.3 Naloxone is added to buprenorphine to decrease the probability that patients will abuse buprenorphine. The addition of Naloxone to Suboxone is critical to its safety and effectiveness.4
From the criminal justice perspective
Those suffering from the brain disease of addiction are filling our jails and prisons throughout the country. From the National Institute on Drug Abuse:
Opioid use disorders are highly prevalent among criminal justice populations. According to data from the U.S. Department of Justice, approximately half of state and federal prisoners meet criteria for substance use disorder. Even so, there has been reticence in criminal justice settings to using medications (methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone) to treat opioid use disorders.5
What this means is that sufferers from addiction who find themselves in the criminal justice system most often do not receive the type of treatment that may be most effective for them and may also be the most beneficial to society. The range of treatment options including MAT, which may prove to be effective and even lifesaving, may best be offered within this highly controlled setting. The lack of addiction treatment generally, and MAT specifically, impacts not only a person’s chance of rehabilitation within incarceration but profoundly influences a person’s experience in the post-incarceration environment.
Again, from the National Institute on Drug Abuse:
A former inmate’s risk of death within the first 2 weeks of release is more than 12 times that of other individuals, with the leading cause of death being a fatal overdose. Overdoses are more common when a person relapses to drug use after a period of abstinence due to loss of tolerance to the drug. Untreated opioid use disorders also contribute to a return to criminal activity, reincarceration, and risky behavior contributing to the spread of HIV and hepatitis B and C infections.5
MAT, using methadone and suboxone, in the post-incarceration environment must be highly considered in today’s crisis situation. MAT has the potential to reduce the fatality rate and assist former inmates transition toward becoming productive members of society.
Related Content: Can a Vaccine Cure Heroin Addiction?
What does the research tell us?
Rikers Island operates the longest standing methadone program for incarcerated prisoners in the country. The program named the “Key Extended Entry Program” (KEEP) has shown to be effective in reducing recidivism and relapse rates. KEEP was started in 1986 with the goal of helping inmates with opioid withdrawal symptoms and transitioning them into ongoing methadone maintenance as they reintegrate back into society.
In 2012, researchers Harris, Selling, Luther, et al. published a study which examined 650 opioid-dependent individuals at Rikers Island. Each patient was placed on an evidenced-based, highly monitored dose-adjustment regimen before being released. This was done to improve the post-incarceration reporting and methadone compliance rate. Professionals involved were highly trained to monitor methadone doses and to adjust as necessary. Effective dosing typically occurred after 21 days in treatment within the jail/prison. When effectively dosed before being released, patients reported for their methadone treatment post-incarceration at the best rates. The study indicated that all patients who reached 55 mg/day before they were released reported for ongoing treatment.6 A remarkable finding.
Such high reporting and adherence rates lowers not only recidivism but also relapse rates. This type of program is saving lives. Evidence from the National Institute of Drug Abuse reveals that if incarcerated patients start methadone at least 1 month before they are released, such treatment increased the probability they will remain in treatment and drug-free six months later.7 This is significant and is strong evidence to implement similar protocols and programs in similar environments across the country.
A comparative study
Another study conducted on KEEP compared randomly assigned inmates to either buprenorphine or methadone treatment. Results from the study were compelling and were as follows from the authors:
- “Buprenorphine group reported for their designated post-release treatment in the community significantly more often than did the methadone group (48% vs. 14%, p < 0.001).”
- “Buprenorphine patients stated an intention to continue treatment after release more often than did methadone patients (93% vs. 44%, p < 0.001).”
- “Buprenorphine patients were also less likely than methadone patients to withdraw voluntarily from medication while in jail (3% vs. 16%, p < 0.05).”8
Both studies are strong indicators of the effectiveness of using MAT for those incarcerated and also post-incarceration.
It is important to note that MAT should also include other kinds of recovery supports over and above just taking drugs such as methadone or suboxone. MAT is most effective when it combines these replacement drugs with ongoing therapy, recovery fellowships, medical care, community, family, and other types of extended recovery support. The combination of these useful drugs and recovery support is better named Medication Assisted Recovery (MAR).
1. Expanding the Use of Medications to Treat Individuals with Substance Use Disorders in Safety-Net Settings (2014) https://www.integration.samhsa.gov/Expanding_the_Use_of_Medications_to_Treat_Individuals_with_SU_Disorders_in_Safety_Net_Settings.pdf
2. WebMD. https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/addiction/methadone
3. Kimball, T.G. (September 2016). Medications to Fight Addiction – Good or Bad? https://thedoctorweighsin.com/medications-to-fight-addiction-good-or-bad/
4. NAABT.Org https://www.naabt.org/faq_answers.cfm?ID=64
5. NIDA. Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in the Criminal Justice System. https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/medications-to-treat-opioid-addiction/treatment-opioid-use-disorder-in-criminal-justice-system
6. Harris A, Selling D, Luther C, et al. Rate of community methadone treatment reporting at jail reentry following a methadone increased dose quality improvement. Subst Abus 2012;33(1):70-75.
7. Addiction Treatment Forum. httpss://atforum.com/2012/05/prisoners-taking-effective-methadone-doses-report-to-methadone-treatment-programs-after-release/
8. Magura, S., Lee, J. D., Hershberger, J., Joseph, H., Marsch, L., Shropshire, C., & Rosenblum, A. (2009). Buprenorphine and Methadone Maintenance in Jail and Post-Release: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 99(1-3), 222–230. httpss://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.08.006
Thomas G. Kimball, PhD
Thomas G. Kimball, Ph.D., LMFT, is the George C. Miller Family Regents Professor at Texas Tech University and the Director of the Center for Collegiate Recovery Communities. Dr. Kimball has been part of the MAP team since 2012 and serves as Clinical Director, where he oversees and consults on the implementation of extended recovery modalities, techniques, and practices on individuals who undergo treatment for Substance Use Disorder (SUD).
He has received numerous teaching awards for his courses on families, addiction, & recovery. He is the author of several peer-reviewed articles on addiction and recovery in respected medical journals, a frequent contributor to leading addiction and recovery publications online, and co-authored the book,
Six Essentials to Achieve Lasting Recovery, by Hazelden Press.
In addition to consulting and presenting on recovery-related issues across the U.S. and internationally, he frequently writes articles pertaining to emerging addiction recovery data, recovery techniques and modalities, the science behind addiction, the addiction crisis, and long term treatment for the chronic disease of addiction.
Dr. Kimball has made the focus of his career studying collegiate and long term addiction recovery by focusing on factors that enhance long term recovery and improve the treatment industry at a local, national, and international level. Follow him @drtomkimball
Comment will held for moderation