By Paul Levy

First Posted at Not Running a Hospital on 6/2/2013

Paul Levy, Host of (Not) Running a Hospital
Paul Levy, Host of (Not) Running a Hospital

Many months ago, Holly Jarek wrote to me:  “I was wondering if sometime in the future, we might schedule a visit for you to come out and see Seven Hills Pediatric Center. Would love the opportunity to share another side of health care with you.”

Well, “sometime” finally happened, and I had a chance to visit this pediatric nursing home in Groton, MA.  This is one of several such facilities across the country, serving an estimated 6000 or so residents who are cognitively under the age of 12 months and are non-ambulatory.  Many require oxygen, feeding tubes, tracheostomies, and other complex medical equipment.  The vast majority are on permanent formula diets.  The 80+ children at Seven Hills receive all necessary medical, nursing, therapy and leisure services.  They also attend a private, special education school, go on field trips and participate in community activities.  Because there is no other place for them to go upon reaching adulthood (age 22), they stay on.  One resident is in his 30s.

Funding for the medical services is provided by Medicaid.  Funding for the school programs is provided under the state’s special education laws by the school districts from which the children come.  A small amount of additional funding comes from the state DSS.

An adjacent dental clinic provides dental services for the residents but also other developmentally disabled people in the community.

Eyal Cohen and others have noted, “Increasing prevalence of children with complex and chronic diseases has occurred in the last half century and will likely continue to occur.” Why? Well, the good news is that medical advances in neonatal intensive care and trauma care have saved lives of children who previously would have died.  The bad news is that some of those who have been saved end up with the kinds of impairments that lead them to places like Seven Hills.  These patients require care that is much more expensive than others.  Cohen and others note (in a review of Canadian patients), “Although a small proportion of the population, CMC (children with medical complexity) account for a substantial proportion of health care costs.”  A recent unpublished presentation about North Carolina noted the same thing, with 5% of children under 18 incurring 54% of the cost for children’s care in Medicaid.

The current political environment for this kind of care is not good.  Let’s start with the votes:  48 million Medicare voters versus 0 children voters!  But beyond this, the current focus on Medicaid is on budget cuts.  Where expansion is being considered, it is adult-centric.  Safety net hospitals are seeing phased reductions under the health reform law.

So the prognosis for organizations like Seven Hills that take care of severe cases, as well as others that take care of other children with medical complexity, is an increased demand for their services combined with a disproportionate reduction in state and federal support.  This group thus joins other disenfranchised sectors of the health care community while the government pours money into those sectors with the political power to get what they want when they want it.

Patricia Salber MD, MBA (@docweighsin)
Patricia Salber, MD, MBA is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of The Doctor Weighs In. She is also the CEO of Health Tech Hatch, the sister site of TDWI that helps innovators tell their stories to the world. She is also a physician executive who has worked in all aspects of healthcare including practicing emergency physician, health plan executive, consultant to employers, CMS, and other organizations. She is a Board Certified Internist and Emergency Physician who loves to write about just about anything that has to do with healthcare.


All comments are moderated. Please allow at least 1-2 days for it to display.